Modeling and Optimization of Relative Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity Ratio of Water-Based MWCNT-Y2O3 Hybrid Nanofluid Using Artificial Neural Network and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kho.C., Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Iran

2 Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kho.C., Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Iran

10.66224/masm.5.2.212.
Abstract
Nanoparticles can enhance the thermophysical properties of base fluids, leading to increased efficiency, especially in heat transfer applications. Therefore, achieving optimized thermophysical properties of nanofluids is of particular importance. In this study, two multilayer feedforward artificial neural networks (ANN) were designed and trained to predict the relative viscosity and thermal conductivity ratio of a water-based hybrid nanofluid MWCNT-Y2O3 (with a nanoparticle weight ratio of 80:20). The nanofluid samples studied contained varying volume concentrations of MWCNT-Y2O3 nanoparticles (from 0.01 to 0.2 percent) in the base fluid. Experimental data for relative viscosity and thermal conductivity ratio at different temperatures (from 25°C to 60°C) were available. For each ANN designed to estimate either the relative viscosity or the thermal conductivity ratio outputs, regression plots corresponding to the training, validation, and testing data sets demonstrated the networks' excellent performance. The mean and maximum relative percentage errors obtained for the testing data were as follows: for relative viscosity output, 0.5120% mean error and 2.5450% maximum error; for thermal conductivity ratio output, 0.1733% mean error and 0.2874% maximum error. Moreover, based on the developed model, a multi-objective optimization problem was formulated to simultaneously determine the minimum relative viscosity and maximum thermal conductivity ratio of the nanofluid. This problem was solved using the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) metaheuristic method. Consequently, the optimal objective function values and input parameters were obtained, and the Pareto optimal points were graphically illustrated.

Keywords


[1] Sarkar J, Ghosh P, Adil A. A review on hybrid nanofluids: recent research, development and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;43:164-77.
[2] Wang X-Q, Mujumdar AS. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. International journal of thermal sciences. 2007;46:1-19.
[3] Sundar LS, Sharma KV, Singh MK, Sousa A. Hybrid nanofluids preparation, thermal properties, heat transfer and friction factor–a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;68:185-98.
[4] Timofeeva EV. Nanofluids for heat transfer–potential and engineering strategies. Two phase flow, phase change and numerical modeling. 2011:435-50.
[5] Al-Oran O, Lezsovits F. Experimental study of thermal conductivity and viscosity of water-based MWCNT-Y2O3 hybrid nanofluid with surfactant. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics. 2022;31:98-110.
[6] Basheer IA, Hajmeer M. Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. Journal of microbiological methods. 2000;43:3-31.
[7] Coello CC. Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field. IEEE computational intelligence magazine. 2006;1:28-36.
[8] Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary computation. 2000;8:173-95.
[9] Zadkhast M, Toghraie D, Karimipour A. Developing a new correlation to estimate the thermal conductivity of MWCNT-CuO/water hybrid nanofluid via an experimental investigation. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2017;129:859-67.
[10] Yadav D, Kumar R, Singh PK. Experimental investigation on rheology property of MWCNT-Al2O3/water hybrid nanofluid.  AIP Conference Proceedings: AIP Publishing LLC; 2018. p. 020042.
[11] Akhgar A, Toghraie D, Sina N, Afrand M. Developing dissimilar artificial neural networks (ANNs) to prediction the thermal conductivity of MWCNT-TiO2/Water-ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid. Powder Technology. 2019;355:602-10.
[12] Rostami S, Toghraie D, Shabani B, Sina N, Barnoon P. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of MWCNT-CuO/water hybrid nanofluid using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2021;143:1097-105.
[13] Giwa SO, Sharifpur M, Ahmadi MH, Sohel Murshed S, Meyer JP. Experimental investigation on stability, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of water-based hybrid nanofluid of MWCNT-Fe2O3. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:136.
[14] Wohld J, Beck J, Inman K, Palmer M, Cummings M, Fulmer R, et al. Hybrid nanofluid thermal conductivity and optimization: original approach and background. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:2847.
[15] Hashempour S, Toghraie D, Fazilati MA. Investigation of the thermal characteristics of water-based hybrid and mono nanofluids containing cerium oxide-CuO-MWCNT nanoparticles at various temperatures and volume fraction of nanoparticles and propose a new relationship. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023;26:1276-92.
[16] Malika M, Pargaonkar A, Sonawane SS. Experimental and statistical analysis of MWCNT hybrid nanofluid-based multi-functional drilling fluid. Chemical Papers. 2023;77:6773-84.
[17] Batur Çolak A. Advancing nanofluid technology: Experimental thermal conductivity measurements and accurate predictive models for yttrium oxide-water nanofluid using neural networks and mathematical correlations. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals. 2025;86:998-1017.
[18] Hemmat Esfe M, Toghraie D, Sarbaz Karajabad M. Novel accurate correlation for thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluid containing MgO and MWCNT: experimental investigation. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2025:1-10.
[19] Aalikhani R, Toghraie D, Mehmandoust B, Salahshour S. Experimental Investigation and Correlation of Viscosity for MgO–MWCNT–CeO2/Water Hybrid Nanofluid. Results in Engineering. 2025:105295.
[20] Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural networks. 2015;61:85-117.
[21] Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computation. 2004;8:256-79.
[22] Coello CAC, Lamont GB, Veldhuizen DAV. Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems: Springer, 2007.
[23] Clerc M, Kennedy J. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computation. 2002;6:58-73.
[24] Heris MK. Particle swarm optimization in MATLAB. URL: https://yarpiz com/50/ypea1. 2015.
Volume 5, Issue 2
Summer 2025
Pages 212-233

  • Receive Date 16 August 2025
  • Revise Date 14 September 2025
  • Accept Date 20 September 2025