Mechanic of Advanced and Smart Materials
Quarterly

Design and Manufacture of Low-Pressure Hydroforming Machine for Aluminum Tubes and Production of Rectangular Cross Section

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Seyed Jala Hashemi 1
Alireza Bahadory 2

1 Assistant professor

2 MSc student, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.52547/masm.2.2.156
Abstract
Tube hydroforming is widely used in the production of structural parts of an Automobile. One of the characteristics of the parts produced by this process is the high strength-to-weight ratio. Low-pressure tube hydroforming is one of the proposed methods to solve tube hydroforming problems such as the need for high fluid pressure and sealing problems. The method of performing low-pressure hydroforming of the tube is like to compressing a solid object, in which, unlike high-pressure hydroforming, the upper mold is not fixed during the process and moves and presses the tube at the same time as internal pressure is applied to the tube. In this paper, the low-pressure hydroforming process of AA6063 aluminum tube is performed and the round section of the tube is transformed into a rectangular cross section by the hydroforming process. Also, the thickness distribution and the values of the radius of the formed corner are investigated under three different loading paths. The results show that by increasing the internal pressure, a smaller corner radius can be achieved but the thinning increases. Also, the maximum flat surface of the upper part is obtained when the upper mold is displaced after the internal pressure reaches its maximum value.

Keywords

Tube forming
Hydroforming
Thickness distribution
Corner radius
[1] Gray J E, Devereaux A P, Parker W M. Apparatus for making wrought metal T's. Google Patents; 1940.
[2] Fuchs F. Hydrostatic pressure--its role in metal forming. Mech Eng. 1966;88:34-40.
[3] Asnafi N. Analytical modelling of tube hydroforming. Thin-walled structures. 1999;34:295-330.
[4] Zafar N. Optimization of tube hydroforming process. Michigan State University. 2002.
[5] Singh H. Fundamentals of hydroforming. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 2003.
[6] Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson P D. FEA comparison of high and low pressure tube hydroforming of TRIP steel. Computational Materials Science. 2009;47:146-152.
[7] Hashemi S J, Naeini H M, Liaghat G, Karami J S, Roohi A H. Prediction of Bursting in Warm Tube Hydroforming using Modified Ductile Fracture Criteria. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 2015;14.
[8] Hwang Y-M, Altan T. FE simulations of the crushing of circular tubes into triangular cross-sections. Journal of materials processing technology. 2002;125:833-838.
[9] Hwang Y-M, Altan T. Finite element analysis of tube hydroforming processes in a rectangular die. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 2003;39:1071-1082.
[10] Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson P D. Die closing force in low pressure tube hydroforming. Journal of materials processing technology. 2010;210:2238-2244.
[11] Zhang X, Chu G, He J, Yuan S. Research on a hydro-pressing process of tubular parts in an open die. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019;104:2795-2803.
[12] Zhang X, He J, Chu G, Yuan S. Experimental research on deformation and dimensional accuracy of rectangular-section tubular part during open die hydro-pressing process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2021;235:705-714.
[13] Nikhare C, Weiss M, Hodgson P D. Buckling in low pressure tube hydroforming. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2017;28:1-10.
[14] Chu G-n, Lin C-y, Li W, Lin Y-l. Effect of internal pressure on springback during low pressure tube hydroforming. International Journal of Material Forming. 2018;11:855-866.
[15] Trott A, Nikhare C P. Effect of preform during low pressure tube hydroforming.52019;V002T002A023.
[16] Nikhare C P, Buddi T, Kotkunde N, Singh S K. Effect of Die Velocity on Tube Deformation Mechanics During Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming Process Sequence Variation.85550;V02AT02A051.
[17] Nikhare C P. A numerical analysis on microtube hydroforging. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies. 2021:1-22.
Mechanic of Advanced and Smart Materials
Volume 2, Issue 2
Summer 2022
Pages 156-171

  • Receive Date 27 April 2022
  • Revise Date 08 July 2022
  • Accept Date 16 August 2022

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us